[托福考试题目回忆]Doyouagreeordisagreewiththefollowingstatement:Scientistsshouldberesponsibleforthenegativeimpactsoftheirdiscoveries.Usespecificreasonsandexamplestosupportyourposition.

　　【Introduction】Scientists,pioneersofhumansociety,havebeenconstantlyexploringtheunknown,unravelingthemysteries,andmakingbreakthroughs.Duringthisprocess,someunexpectedtroubles,however,areunfortunatelyinevitable.Whilescientistscouldalertpeople,theycanhardlypreventthosetroubles.Besides,ifscientistswereheldresponsibleforthosenegativeimpacts,theywouldbedemotivatedtoinnovate.Hence,weshouldnotblamescientistsfortheundesirableresultsofscientificfindings.

　　托福独立写作真题范文：科学家要负责吗？

　　【Body】Forstarters,scientistsshouldnotbescapegoats.Inanotherword,【强调句】itistheusers,likepoliticiansorbusinessmen,whoshouldshoulderresponsibilityofthenegativeimpactsofscientificfindings.【巧妙对比也是论证方法之一】Justlikeaknifecouldbeusedtocutbreadortomurdersomeone,ascientificdiscoverycanbeusedtobenefitorhurtpeople.Takescientificfindingsinphysics,namelyweapons,asanexample.Whileitcouldbeusedtodetercriminals,itmayalsoabusedbycriminalstokillinnocentcivilians,whichiscertainlycontrarytoscientists’intention.Inthiscase,thenegativeeffectofsuchfindingsisnotuptoitsfinders,scientists,buttotheusers.[写作思路]非常简单的逻辑：就像一把刀可以用来切菜或谋杀一样，科学研究也会因为用户“intentions不同产生不同的效果。所以很明显，当你拥有“badintentions当这些研究在使用“坏人”时造成危害时，有“坏人”goodintention科学家当然不应该对此负责。

　　【Body】[虚拟语气]Werethescientistsaskedtobeaccountableforallthepossiblenegativeoutcomesoftheirdiscoveries,itwouldundoubtedlyhindertheprogressofscience.Tospecify,theadventofanyscientificfindingscannotbedivorcedfromboldattempts.Ifscientistsarerequiredtoberesponsiblefornegativeimpactsoftheirprogressions,theymaybecomeovercautiousorevenscaredtomakeprogresses.Contrarily,scientistswhoareexemptedfromtakingresponsibilityfortheunexpectednegativeeffecttendtobemoremotivatedindiscovering.Therefore,fortheadventofnewtechnologies,scientistsshouldnotberesponsibleforthenegativeimpact.[写作思路]科学研究必须通过不断大胆的尝试来完成，当科学家知道他们将来会对任何潜在的风险负责（当然，这很可能）时，他们会变得过于谨慎，很难创新。

　　【Body】Admittedly,scientistsshouldbeawareofthepotentialhazardsbehindfindings,andtheyareresponsibleforinformingtheusersofthoseharms.However,negligencearenottotallyavoidableyetcompletelyunderstandable.Nottomention,eveniftheusersarecrystalclearaboutthosepotentialnegativeimpacts,theymaystillmakemistakestriggeringthosepotentialimpacts,eitherbecausetheyar